The Research Assistant: Resources for Behavioral Science Researchers.
Home Funding Grant Writing Research Tools Minority Focus Search Site Map
Grant Writing   >  After Your Grant Is Submitted  >  The NIH Review Process  
links to tools
funding database
  
journal database
  
bookstore
  
links library
 Tutorial NavBar Formulating a Question Your Proposal Team Writing the proposal After Your Grant is Submitted Fatal Flaws and Common Pitfalls

Glossary                                     Display Your Outline

The NIH Review Process

The grant review process at the NIH is a two-step process designed to provide a fair review of every application. In order to prevent a conflict of interest, the two-step review isolates a project's scientific merit (the IRG review) from its implications for the policy of a particular institute (the Council Review).

The schematic below is a general representation of the NIH grant review process. Remember, there is no single way in which all applications are reviewed, so it's crucial to educate yourself about the process and to stay in contact with your NIH-designated point-of-contact.

Grant applications are sent to the NIH Center for Scientific Review.

Down Arrow

Within 6 weeks of the NIH receipt date, applicants should receive an assignment letter. This letter details a) the NIH institute/s to which the application has been assigned for possible funding,
b) the 12-14 character assignment number indicating the funding mechanism being applied for,
c) the scientific review group (SRG)/study section that will review the application, and
d) the name and contact information of the Scientific Review Administrator (SRA) who will manage the study section.

Down Arrow

The SRA of the study section administratively reviews the applications to assess appropriateness of assignment, completeness of application, adherence of application to PHS guidelines, and scientific and technical expertise needed to fairly and appropriately review the application. The SRA assigns each application to two or more reviewers to provide written critiques and lead review meeting discussion of that application.

Down Arrow

Four to eight weeks before the study section is to meet, applications are sent to study section members.

Down Arrow

The study section meets. Members decide which applications have sufficient scientific and technical merit to be discussed and scored. The other applications, deemed to have lesser scientific and technical merit, are neither discussed nor scored.

Down Arrow

Within two weeks of the study section meeting, applicants should receive a letter indicating whether their application was scored, and if scored, noting its priority score. If the score was percentiled, the percentile will also be included.

Down Arrow

Summary statements for all applications are compiled and mailed to PIs within two months of the meeting.

Down Arrow

The National Advisory Council of the assigned institute meets to determine whether study sections performed fair and appropriate review of all applications assigned to that institute for possible funding.

Down Arrow

The Institute decides whether to fund the application. PIs are notified of funding status six to 10 months after submission.

**Some applications, such as those for Small Business Innovative Research grants and fellowships and those focused on HIV/AIDS, receive expedited review.

 

  

back Back

top

Top

Nextnext


 

For questions or comments regarding this site, email: info@theresearchassistant.com.
Copyright 2002, Danya International, Inc. All rights reserved.
Last updated: August 12, 2003.